After reading “The Book if Negroes” and analyzing the text
with various literary criticisms, I can confidently state that archetypal
literary criticism was the most effective in revealing the most within the
text. The archetypal theory brings out
the importance of common characters and plot events. The novel follows Aminata’s entire life
journey, beginning in her youth, following her through her decent into the
danger of challenges she faces, and finishing off on her death bed once she has
finally returned to a comfortable state at the end of her journey. These major events and the extent of her
challenges and how she matured from innocence to experience would be missed if
the text were analyzed from a different literary criticism. For example, if one were to examine the text
from a feminist standpoint, what would be revealed from the text would be the
mistreatment and expected behavior she received due to her gender. If we were to focus on what Aminata
experienced on the boat to America, the largest challenge she faced was trying
to navigate the abusive toubab who were constantly sexually abusing the
women. (74) When analyzing this from an
archetypal perspective, what would stand out was what the boat
represented. It was a symbol of her
decent into danger and how more hardships were bound to be coming her way at
rapid speed. Archetypal theory allows
the reader to predict what is coming next, as other theories focus more on what
is happening in the present.
With this said archetypal literary criticism also exposes
more about the characters and the roles they play within the novel. The most commonly known archetypal figures
are the wise old man, great mother, the trickster fox, and of course the
hero. As you could have already guessed,
these are all seen throughout the novel.
Daddy Moses is the wise old man, Georgia is the great mother, Applebee s
the trickster fox and Aminata is the hero.
For example as to how well these characters fit these roles, if you take
Applebee and analyze his character from an archetypal point of view you get a
deeper understanding of how much of a perfect match he truly is. Applebee was an antagonist who abused and
shamed Aminata on a daily basis when she was his slave. (160) He went snooping for information and
used it to secretly steal Aminata’s son from her. (184) His devious mind, sneaky traits, and
lack of morals make him the trickster fox.
The way he would constantly be surprising Aminata with information she
thought he would never know, would foreshadow to another encounter between the
two characters/ another appearance later on in the story. He didn’t get all he wanted out of Aminata so
it was no surprise he claimed her again. (306) If the reader was viewing from
lets say a response theory, they would more than likely assume Applebee was
just being selfish and wanted to cause more hardship for Aminata and go into a
more in depth analysis of his character.
Archetypal for sure reveals more about the plot and
characters than any other theory I would create my thesis around the following…
“When analyzing “The Book of Negroes” The hero’s quest the main character
follows as well as the common characteristics shared throughout the novel, is
easily detected through archetypal literary criticism that would be missed if
any other literary criticism were to be used.”